Robotic-assisted single-site abdominal cerclage in the bicornuate uterus patient with cervical insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the surgical techniques for improving safety in robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage in patients with bicornuate uteri complicated by recurrent pregnancy loss and cervical insufficiency. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage. SETTING: An academic tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Our patient is a 22-year-old G2P0020 with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. During her first pregnancy, she was asymptomatic until 19 weeks and delivered because of a preterm premature rupture of membranes. A transvaginal cerclage was performed for her second pregnancy at 14 weeks, which ended at 16 weeks because of preterm premature rupture of membranes. The final magnetic resonance imaging report noted a "bicorporeal uterus with duplication of the uterine body, resulting in two markedly divergent uterine horns that are fused at the isthmus... unlike a typical didelphic uterus, a single, non septated cervix is noted, which shows normal appearances, measuring 3.8 cm in length." Given her history of a uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss in the absence of other biochemical factors, her maternal-fetal medicine specialist referred her to us as the patient strongly desired future viable pregnancies. The patient was counseled on multiple alternatives, including different methods of performing the cerclage, and ultimately decided on the robotic-assisted (Da Vinci Xi) prophylactic abdominal cerclage. INTERVENTIONS: The bicornuate uterus is a rare class IV mullerian duct anomaly caused by the impaired fusion of the mullerian ducts in the uterus, classically appearing in imaging studies as a heart-shaped uterus. This patient demographic reports a high incidence of obstetric complications. Pregnancy in such a uterus causes complications like first- and second-trimester pregnancy loss, preterm labor, low-birthweight infants, and malpresentation at delivery.1 Researchers have postulated that there is an abnormal ratio of muscle fibers to connective tissue in a congenitally abnormal cervix. During pregnancy, an inadequate uterine volume may lead to increased intrauterine pressure and stress on the lower uterine segment, which can lead to cervical incompetence.2 To address cervical incompetence, cervical cerclages are a commonly utilized procedure, as recent studies demonstrate that the incidence of term pregnancies in the group with documented cervical incompetence treated with cerclage placement increased from 26% to 63%.3 One observational study noted improved obstetrical outcomes occurred with interval placement, a cerclage placed in between pregnancies in the nongravid uterus, compared with cerclage placement between 9 and 10 weeks gestation, with the mean gestational age for delivery at 32.9 weeks and 34.5 weeks when a cerclage was placed in gravid and nongravid women, respectively.4 In addition, another retrospective study was done, which demonstrated a lower incidence of neonatal death with prophylactic cerclages.5 Operating on a nonpregnant uterus offers several benefits, including its reduced size, fewer and smaller blood vessels, and simplified handling. Moreover, there are clearly no concerns regarding the fetus. In the decision to use a robotic-assisted platform vs. laparoscopic, a systematic review showed the rates of third-trimester delivery and live birth (LB) using laparoscopy during pregnancy were found to be 70% and 70%-100%, respectively. The same review demonstrated slightly improved outcomes via the robotic route regarding gestational age at delivery (median, 37 weeks), rates of LB (90%), and third-trimester delivery (90%).6 Additional factors contributing to the preference for robotics in surgical procedures include incorporating advanced tools, which can enhance the robotic system's advantages compared with traditional laparoscopy. An invaluable tool in this context is the simultaneous utilization of Firefly mode, which employs a near-infrared camera system, achieved through injecting indocyanine green dye or integrating other light sources concurrently. The intravenous administration of indocyanine green is acknowledged widely for its safety and efficacy as a contrast agent in the evaluation of microvascular circulation and organ vascularization. This property equips surgeons with heightened precision when guiding the needle, proving especially advantageous when faced with challenges in visualizing vascular anatomy. In our specific case, we harnessed the capabilities of Firefly mode in conjunction with hysteroscopic light, enabling us to vividly illustrate the contours of a bicornuate uterus from both external and internal perspectives. We demonstrate a simplified technique of the abdominal cerclage, one cerclage around the internal cervical os of the uterus, using a robotic-assisted platform in a nongravid patient. The surgery began with the eversion of the umbilicus, and a 15-mm skin incision was made in the umbilicus. A Gelpoint mini advanced access site laparoscopy device was inserted into the incision, and CO2 was allowed to insufflate the abdominal cavity with careful attention given to intraabdominal pressure. Once the DaVinci was docked, the surgeon began the creation of a bladder flap. The bladder was carefully dissected from the lower uterine segment and both uteri using monopolar scissors. The anatomical differences of a bicornuate uterus prompted the surgeon to dissect a wider circumference for safety reasons, where a wider dissection offers a better view of the uterine vessels and ease of introducing the Mersilene tape later on. Bilateral uterine vessels were further skeletonized and exposed anteriorly using blunt dissection and monopolar scissors. After further dissection and lateralization, the final result creates a landmark medial to the right uterine vessels at the level of the internal cervical os with which the needle of the Mersilene tape will be able to pass through. The Mersilene tape was guided from anterior to posterior via a previously straightened needle. Similarly, a landmark was created on the left, and the Mersilene tape was directed from anterior to posterior. The Mersilene tape was placed circumferentially around the internal cervical os of the bicornuate uterus, medial to the uterine vessels. Both ends of the Mersilene tape were then gently pulled, ensuring that the tape was lying flat on the anterior of the internal cervical os with no bowels or uterine vessels within it. The tape was then tied posteriorly at the 6 o'clock position with appropriate tension. A 2-0 silk was then sutured to the tails of the tape using the purse-string technique to ensure that it would remain securely tied and in the correct position. Hemostasis was assured. Both a hysteroscopy and a cystoscopy were done after the completion of the cerclage to ensure that no tape or sutures were seen within the cervical canal or the uterine cavity. None were observed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The success criteria for the surgery were identified as the patient's ability to attain a viable pregnancy after the cerclage placement, along with achieving LB. RESULTS: Subsequently, a spontaneous pregnancy was achieved. An infant weighing 3 pounds and 16 ounces was delivered by cesarean section at 36 weeks because of an oligohydramnios. The infant is currently healthy at 13 pounds. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage around the internal cervical os in a bicornuate uterus offers a possibly feasible and straightforward technique for surgeons seeking to reduce risks, although further research is needed.

Application value of ultrasound elastography for screening of early pregnancy cervical insufficiency: a retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate changes in the cervical strain rate (SR), cervical length (CL), and uterine artery blood flow parameters during early pregnancy in women with cervical insufficiency and evaluate the clinical efficacy of these markers for screening of cervical insufficiency in early pregnancy. METHODS: This retrospective study in 60 pregnant women with cervical insufficiency and 100 normal pregnant women was conducted between September 2021 and January 2023 and measured ultrasound parameters of the cervix during early pregnancy. The cervical SR, CL, and uterine artery resistance index (RI) were measured in both groups at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Strain elastography represented by the SR was used to assess the hardness of the internal and external cervical openings. RESULTS: During early pregnancy, the SR at the internal and external cervical openings were significantly higher in the cervical insufficiency group than those in the normal pregnancy group (SR I: 0.19 ± 0.018% vs. 0.16 ± 0.014%; SR E: 0.26 ± 0.028% vs. 0.24 ± 0.025%; p < .001). The CL was significantly shorter in the cervical insufficiency group than that measured in the normal pregnancy group (34.3 ± 2.9 mm vs. 35.2 ± 1.99 mm; p = .036), while cervical blood perfusion was also poorer in the cervical insufficiency group than that in the normal pregnancy group (uterine artery RI: 0.76 ± 0.07 vs. 0.74 ± 0.05; p = .048). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal critical values for diagnosing cervical insufficiency were 0.17% for SR I, 0.25% for SR E, 33.8 mm for CL, and 0.78 for uterine artery RI. Of these parameters, the ROC curve for SR I had the largest area under the curve [AUC = 0.89 (p < .001)], with the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (82%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the SR at the internal cervical opening (OR 17.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.08-60.08; p < .001) and CL (OR 5.05, 95% CI 1.66-15.32; p = .004) still showed significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Cervical elastography is an effective tool for screening early pregnancy cervical insufficiency. The SR at the internal cervical opening is a valuable indicator for screening cervical insufficiency and has superior clinical efficacy for screening for this condition compared to that of CL and the uterine artery blood flow index.

Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience.

Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the time between removal of cerclage and delivery, stratified by indication for cerclage placement (elective or non-elective). Additionally, delivery within 72 hours after cerclage removal was compared between elective and non-elective cerclage placement, as well as between ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage placement. Design: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Participants/Materials, Setting, and Methods. Clinical information of 72 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cerclage over a 4-year period was obtained. Comparisons were made between elective (history-indicated) and non-elective (ultrasound or physical examination-indicated) cerclage placement. Comparisons were also made between physical examination-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Results: Compared to those who had a non-elective cerclage, women undergoing elective cerclage were more likely to have history of cervical treatment (44% vs. 15%, p = 0.02), and spontaneous preterm delivery (92% vs. 61%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of delivery ≤72 hours following cerclage removal between women who had elective cerclage and those who had non-elective cerclage (46% vs. 58%, p = 0.47). Women who had an elective cerclage were more likely to have elective cerclage removal ≥36 weeks (71.8% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.01), compared to those who had undergone non-elective cerclage. The rate of delivery ≤72 hours following removal of cerclage was greater in women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage compared to women who had ultrasound-indicated cerclage (80% vs. 39%, p = 0.04). Among women who had an elective cerclage, there was no difference in the rate of delivery at ≤72 hours between those who had elective cerclage removal at 36 weeks compared to those electively removed at 37 weeks (31% vs. 58%, p = 0.30). No complications such as fetal demise, iatrogenic amniotic membrane rupture, hemorrhage, or cervical laceration were reported within this cohort. Conclusion: Cerclage indication should be considered prior to scheduling elective cerclage removal. Women who had an elective cerclage are most likely to get it electively removed at 36 weeks compared to their counterparts who had a non-elective cerclage. Furthermore, women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage are most likely to deliver within 72 hours of cerclage removal.

Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage during pregnancy: a simplified approach.

Cervical insufficiency is a major cause of second-trimester pregnancy loss and spontaneous preterm delivery. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage is usually performed before pregnancy for patients of cervical insufficiency, in whom transvaginal cervical cerclage procedure cannot be placed or has failed previously. Performing a transabdominal cerclage becomes a huge challenge owing to the enlargement of the pregnant uterus in patients who were indicated for transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage but were missed before pregnancy. Here, we have outlined an easy and effective surgical procedure as needle-free laparoscopic trans-broad-ligament cervicoisthmic cerclage during early second-trimester. Laparoscope with 4 trocars was established, after expanding the trigonum of ureter, ovarian vascular and ascending branch of uterine artery. The needleless Mersilene tape was inserted in a posterior-to-anterior direction of bilateral trigonums, tightening the knot toward the bladder uterine reflection and simultaneously pushing the loop behind the uterus, directed to the cervix progressively. The tape was then tied anteriorly at the cervico-isthmic junction with 5 to 6 intracorporeal square knots after transvaginal ultrasound determined the presence of systolic velocity of uterine artery with first knot. The primary feature of our procedure was that the needleless Mersilene tape was inserted centrally from the broad ligaments, lateral to the uterine vessels, and finally tied above the uterosacral ligament at the level of the uterine isthmus, without dissecting the bladder off from lower uterine segment and without separating the uterine vessels from the lateral wall of the cervix. We performed this procedure on 10 patients with pregnancy outcomes and there was no pregnancy loss. This procedure proved to be an accessible and effective surgical technique for transabdominal cerclage of the uterine cervix during early-second trimester, with affirmative prognosis.

Cervical cerclage after prior uterine and cervical surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cerclage placement after uterine and cervical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared patients with a prior uterine surgery (with or without cervical surgery) with women having a cerclage for the "classical" indications. Under the classical indications fall history of one or more second-trimester pregnancy losses related to painless cervical dilation, prior cerclage due to painless cervical dilation in the second trimester, painless cervical dilation in the second trimester, ultrasonographic finding with a history of prior preterm birth, prior spontaneous preterm birth at less than 34 weeks of gestation and short cervical length (less than 25 mm) before 24 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Forty-seven (44.8%) patients had uterine surgery whereas 58 (55.2%) had the "classical" indications for cerclage. The risk of birth at <37 weeks and birth weight <2500 g was similar, but lower for cerclage after previous uterine/cervical surgery for births >37 weeks (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.8) and hence, for birth weights >2500 g (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9). Both groups had similar incidence of preterm rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, need for induction of labor, cesarean births as well as low Apgar scores and admission rates to the NICU. CONCLUSIONS: The major goals of reducing births at <37 weeks and low birth weight of <2500 g are achievable with a cerclage in patients with a prior uterine/cervical surgery as it is in patients with a "classical" indication for cerclage placement.

Pessary use in patients diagnosed with short cervix and cervical insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Arabin pessary use in patients with cervical insufficiency or short cervix before the 24th week of gestation and the impact of cervical examination findings prior to pessary application on the outcome in terms of the gestational week. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study, among the pregnancies between the 12th and 24th gestational weeks, 60 pregnant women with a preterm delivery history and/or cervical length less than 25 mm were included. Among these 60 patients, 43 of them had a short cervix, 17 of them had cervical insufficiency. Routine medical and obstetric history was obtained. In the vaginal examination, the cervix was evaluated in terms of patency, dilatation, and position. Cervical length, presence of debris, and funneling were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound. After receiving patients' approval a cervical pessary was applied to patients. Pessaries of pregnant women with 37 weeks of gestation were removed. Before reaching the 37th gestation week, pessaries were withdrawn in patients who had ongoing vaginal bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, and preterm contractions unresponsive to tocolytic treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-one pregnant women (51.7%) out of 60 pregnant women who underwent pessary, delivered at 37 weeks and below. Delivery rates in the short cervical measurement group and cervical insufficiency group at ≤28 weeks, ≤34 weeks and ≤37 weeks were respectively (n = 21) 34.8% vs 36.3% (p = 0.976), (n = 29) 41.8% vs 64.7% (p = 0.111), (n = 31) 44.2% vs 70.6% (p = 0.888). The presence of cervical funneling before pessary application shows a statistically significant difference in terms of patient's giving birth before or after 28 weeks (p = 0.033). In patients with cervical funneling, there was a significant increase in a birth before 28 weeks. Depending on whether or not patients applying with pain need for tocolysis, it shows the statistically meaningful difference in terms of the patients giving birth before or after 34 weeks (p = 0.001) (OR 7, 61, 95% GA 2.4-24.6). In the group without the need for tocolysis, there is a meaningful increase in birth after 34 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that, alongside the defined cervical risk factors, cervical funneling and the need for tocolysis are remarkable prognostic variables in pessary application.

Ultrasonographic features of uterine cervical lesions.

Currently, ultrasound (US) is a valuable imaging tool for the initial assessment and evaluation of the female genital organs, uterus, and adnexa. However, it is easy to overlook the uterine cervix while conducting a pelvic US. Uterine cervical lesions may range from benign to malignant in nature. Therefore, meticulous examination with US may play a key role in assessing uterine cervical lesions. Although there is substantial overlap in the US findings across various uterine cervical lesions, some US features, in tandem with clinical characteristics, may suggest a specific diagnosis. Familiarity with the clinical settings and US characteristics of different uterine cervical lesions can support prompt and accurate diagnosis of suspicious lesions. This review article aims to describe the features of US and possible values for distinction of these lesions in the uterine cervix.

A new quantification system for assessing the degree of acute cervical insufficiency based on physical and sonographic examination.

OBJECTIVES: Acute cervical insufficiency accounts for 10-25 % of all mid-trimester pregnancy losses. However, the definition and description for the degree of acute cervical insufficiency were obscure and different among the many studies. The aim of this study was to suggest a new 4-digit quantification system and to evaluate the outcome according to the new system in women with acute cervical insufficiency. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with acute cervical insufficiency who underwent physical examination indicated cervical cerclage. Acute cervical insufficiency was defined as painless external os dilation with prolapsed and/or visible membranes on speculum examination. The status of fetal membranes was described using two values: 1) size of the prolapsed membrane (P, measured using ultrasound); and 2) size of visible fetal membranes (M, evaluated by speculum examination). The status of cervix was described using two values: 1) dilatation of the narrowest os (O, measured by ultrasound); and 2) functional cervical length (C, measured by ultrasound). The patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: Stage I, patients with visible fetal membranes (M > 0) but with a remaining functional cervix (C > 0) (N = 7); stage II, those with visible fetal membranes (M > 0) and a functional cervical length of 0 but without prolapsed membranes (P = 0) (N = 33); and stage III, those with prolapsed membranes (P > 0) (N = 40). RESULTS: 1) Patients who delivered before 34 weeks of gestation had a significantly lower median gestational age at cerclage operation and a significantly higher median P, M, C values than those who delivered at or beyond 34 weeks of gestation(P < 0.01 for gestational age at operation, P and M values; P < 0.05 for C value); 2) The higher the stage based on PMOC quantification system, the greater the risk of preterm delivery before <24, <32, <34, and <37 weeks of gestation (P < 0.001 for all); 3) The neonatal survival rate was 100 % (7/7) for stage I, 93.9 % (31/33) for stage II, and 60 % (24/40) for stage III. CONCLUSION: The PMOC system was a simple method to describe the individualized conditions and to predict the risk of preterm births in all spectrums of acute cervical insufficiency.

Guideline No. 401: Sonographic Cervical Length in Singleton Pregnancies: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

OBJECTIVES: • To assess the association between sonography-derived cervical length measurement and preterm birth. • To describe the various techniques to measure cervical length using sonography. • To review the natural history of the short cervix. • To review the clinical uses, predictive ability, and utility of sonography-measured short cervix. OUTCOMES: Reduction in rates of prematurity and/or better identification of those at risk, as well as possible prevention of unnecessary interventions. INTENDED USERS: Clinicians involved in the obstetrical management or cervical imaging of patients at increased risk of a short cervix. TARGET POPULATION: Women at increased risk of a short cervix or at risk of preterm birth. EVIDENCE: Literature published up to June 2019 was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (preterm labour, ultrasound, cervix, cervical insufficiency, transvaginal, transperineal, cervical length, fibronectin). Results were restricted to general and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The evidence and this guideline were reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, and the recommendations were made and graded according to the rankings of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Online Appendix Table A1). BENEFITS, HARMS, COSTS: Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Use of the sonographic technique reviewed in this guideline may help identify women at risk of preterm birth and, in some circumstances, lead to interventions that may reduce the rate of preterm birth. SUMMARY STATEMENTS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES): RECOMMENDATIONS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES).

A four step strategy for robot assisted abdominal cerclage placement prior to pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a simple, stepwise strategy for robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement before pregnancy. DESIGN: Demonstrative video presentation. Surgical footage surrounding a case report is used to describe a four-step technique for robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement in women with recurrent pregnancy loss or other anatomic variants before pregnancy. This video article was reviewed by the Investigational Review Board and further investigation was waived because the study was "not considered human subject research." SETTING: Tertiary medical center. PATIENT(S): A 38-year-old G4P0220 (Gestations: 4, Term deliveries: 0, Preterm deliveries: 2, Abortions: 2, Living children: 0) with a history of two second trimester losses who had failed a prior history-indicated transvaginal cerclage (Fig. 1). INTERVENTION(S): The patient underwent an uncomplicated robot-assisted abdominal cerclage using a four-step strategy: Step 1, create the bladder flap; Step 2, identify pertinent anatomy; Step 3, place the cerclage; and Step 4, hysteroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative technique presenting a four-step method to ensure successful robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement. RESULT(S): Robot-assisted abdominal cerclage is a safe, viable alternative to traditional abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy. This video outlines four critical steps to facilitate placement and decrease patient morbidity. This patient did well operatively without increased blood loss or operative time and was discharged home on postoperative day 1. She went on to have a successful future pregnancy and currently is scheduled for an elective cesarean section at term. CONCLUSION(S): Abdominal cerclages significantly improve pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women who previously have failed transvaginal cerclage. Robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement allows a minimally invasive approach with enhanced dexterity and better visualization for the surgeon compared with conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy, as well as decreased pain and shorter recovery time for patients. This video demonstrates placement of a robot-assisted abdominal cerclage in a patient with recurrent pregnancy loss using a simple four-step strategy to ensure successful, correct, and easy placement. To our knowledge, this is the first video demonstrating a stepwise approach to robot-assisted abdominal cerclage placement.

Parto pré-termo espontâneo sem rotura de membranas: prevalência, fatores de risco e o papel do colo uterino / Spontaneous preterm birth without premature rupture of membranes: prevalence, risk factors and the role of the cervix

Cerca de 15 milhões de prematuros nascem por ano globalmente. Em 2015 ocorreram mais de 4 milhões de mortes de crianças menores de 5 anos, e as complicações da prematuridade são a principal causa de óbito em neonatos. O parto pré-termo é uma síndrome em que múltiplas etiologias convergem para uma via final única, e os fatores de risco mais importantes são antecedente de prematuridade e gestação gemelar. O colo uterino tem a função de manter a gestação desde a concepção até o parto, e seu processo de amadurecimento gera esvaecimento, dilatação e encurtamento, num continuum que pode compreender desde quadros de insuficiência cervical até o parto pré-termo espontâneo sem rotura de membranas. Este primeiro artigo, da série de três, descreve a prevalência da prematuridade, seus fatores de risco e o papel do colo uterino no processo de parturição.(AU)

Around 15 million preterm births happen globally. In 2015 over 4 million deaths in children under 5 years of age died and preterm birth complications is the leading cause in neonates. Preterm birth is a multiple etiology syndrome, in which various causes converge to a single parturition path. The most important risk factors are multiple gestation and obstetrical history of preterm birth. Uterine cervix is responsible for pregnancy maintenance from conception to birth, and its remodeling process generates effacement, dilation and shortening in a continuum that comprises conditions from cervical insufficiency to preterm birth without membrane disruption. This is a first article, of a series of three, describing preterm birth prevalence, risk factors and uterine cervix role in parturition.(AU)

Comprimento de colo uterino ao ultrassom transvaginal como preditor de risco do parto pré-termo espontâneo / Ultrasound cervical lenght predicting risk for spontaneous preterm birth

O encurtamento do colo uterino é parte da via final comum da parturição seja a termo ou pré-termo. A identificação precoce do comprimento cervical encurtado ao ultrassom transvaginal no segundo trimestre gestacional pode atuar como preditor de risco de prematuridade. Desde a década de 1990, vários estudiosos dedicaram-se a estabelecer parâmetros de referência para as medidas de colo uterino entre 16 e 24 semanas e até hoje o limite mais consensualmente aceito é de 25 mm. Especialistas são favoráveis à triagem universal, mas diretrizes internacionais são controversas quanto à investigação em casos sem antecedente de parto pré-termo, além de diversos estudos apresentarem que há custo-efetividade no rastreamento universal. Neste artigo, discutimos criticamente os parâmetros apresentados por estudos históricos e balizadores de conduta, a custo-efetividade e os guidelines internacionais. Propomos ainda uma reflexão ao pré-natalista, sugerindo a individualização da conduta perante os dados de cada gestante específica.(AU)

Cervical shortening is the final path of parturition, regardless if it is term or preterm. Precocious identification of a shortened cervix by transvaginal ultrasound during the second gestational trimester can act as a risk predictor of prematurity. Since the 1990´s decade, numerous studies established reference ranges for cervical length measurement between 16 to 24 gestational weeks and the most accepted cutoff limit is 25 mm. Experts indicate universal screening, however international guidelines are controversial, even in cases without a history of preterm birth, furthermore, many studies demonstrated cost-effectiveness about the universal screening of cervical length in middle gestation. In this article we discuss historical reference ranges, cost- -effectiveness, and international guidelines. We propose critical thinking and suggest individualized management according to specific characteristics of each patient.(AU)

Factors associated with preterm birth in women undergoing cervical cerclage.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical cerclage is used to manage women at high risk of late miscarriage (LM) and spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) due to factors such as history of cervical insufficiency (CI), uterine anomaly, cervical surgery and ultrasound (US) diagnosed cervical shortening. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and subsequent pyelonephritis, and bacterial infection are associated with PTB, but their role in PTB after cervical cerclage is unknown. We examined the relationship between UTI and bacterial vaginosis (BV), fetal fibronectin (fFN) test and PTB in women undergoing elective- or US-indicated cervical cerclage. We also investigated whether fetal fibronectin (fFN) test were useful to predict PTB. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single center, retrospective study of singleton pregnant women at PTB clinic, University College London Hospital (UCLH, 2005-2015) who underwent elective or US-indicated cervical cerclage. Women were tested for UTI and BV before cerclage placement and received mid-gestation fFN testing. Patient data were extracted from the PTB clinic database and electronic records. Statistical analyses used Pearson's chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected by Bonferroni method as required. RESULTS: 267 singleton pregnant women attended our clinic with completed birth outcome. Of those, 32.2% (86/267) delivered prematurely. All women with UTI or BV received antibiotic treatment. Women with a UTI before cerclage placement were more likely to deliver preterm when compared to those with negative MSU culture (OR 3.39, 95%CI 1.24-9.27, p = 0.04). Their gestational age at delivery were also lower than those with negative MSU result (36+6, IQR 31+4-38+2week vs 38+1, IQR 36+1-39+5-week, p = 0.05). However, UTI after cerclage placement or BV either before or after cerclage placement were not associated with PTB. Women who had a positive fFN result were more likely to deliver preterm (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.81-8.41, p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a UTI before cervical cerclage is associated with a higher rate of PTB in women who receive a cervical cerclage, even when treated. We did not find an association between pre or post-cerclage BV or post-cerclage UTI and PTB. Further research is needed to elucidate the link between UTI and PTB in women undergoing cervical cerclage.

Assessment of the cervix in pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency during the first trimester using elastography.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate changes in first trimester cervical elastography, cervical length and endocervical canal width in pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency, and further discuss the possibility of using these markers as predictors of cervical insufficiency in early pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an observational ultrasound study of first trimester cervical changes in singleton pregnancies between January 2016 and June 2018. Cervical elastography, cervical length and endocervical canal width were measured during the first trimester. Strain elastography was used to estimate the softness of anterior and posterior cervical lips and was expressed as percentages (strain rate). RESULTS: Of the 339 pregnant women enrolled, 24 had a history of cervical insufficiency. The anterior cervical lip was significantly softer in the cervical insufficiency group (strain rate: 0.19% ± 0.05% vs 0.11% ± 0.04%; P < .001). Cervical length was significantly shorter in the cervical insufficiency group (36.3 ± 4.8 mm vs 38.3 ± 3.8 mm; P = .014). Endocervical canal width was significantly wider in the cervical insufficiency group (5.7 ± 1.1 mm vs 5.2 ± 0.7 mm; P = .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that the optimal cut-off values of anterior cervical lip, cervical length and endocervical canal width to confirm the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency were 0.15%, 35.5 mm and 5.75 mm, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, significant differences were still observed in anterior cervical strain rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 53.78, 95% [confidence interval [CI] 11-270; P < .001) and endocervical canal width (adjusted OR, 5.41, 95% CI,1.2-24.7; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: First trimester cervical elastography is a valuable tool in the assessment of women with a history of cervical insufficiency. The anterior cervical lip was significantly softer in women with a history of cervical insufficiency, and the sensitivity and specificity of anterior cervical lip strain were better than that of cervical length and endocervical canal width.

Cervical length surveillance for predicting spontaneous preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine anomalies occur in an estimated 5% of women and have been shown to confer a higher risk of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB). A sonographically short cervix (<25 mm) is a risk indicator for SPTB, although its predictive utility has been little studied in this specific high-risk population. We aimed to assess the pregnancy outcomes and predictive ability of short cervix in a cohort of women with uterine anomalies attending a high-risk antenatal clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This historical cohort study assessed all pregnancies in women with congenital uterine anomalies referred to the Preterm labor Clinic at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, between 2004 and 2013. Logistic and linear regressions and receiver-operator curves were used to examine associations between cervical length and preterm birth. RESULTS: SPTB (<37 weeks' gestation) occurred in 23% of the 86 pregnancies (n = 20); rates by subgroup were: unicornuate uterus 60% (n = 3/5), uterus didelphys 40% (n = 6/15), bicornuate uterus 18% (n = 9/51), septate uterus 13% (n = 2/15). Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes occurred in 55% of spontaneous preterm births and was not independently associated with the presence of cervical cerclage or ureaplasma urealyticum. Short cervical length was associated with SPTB in women with septate uterus. Short cervix at 24 weeks (not at 16 or 20 weeks) was moderately predictive of SPTB < 34 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Women with uterine anomalies are at increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth, particularly those with unicornuate uterus or uterus didelphys, but cervical surveillance did not identify these cases. Short cervix may be associated with SPTB in women with septate uterus. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes occurred in 55% of SPTB. More research is required into etiology to help determine appropriate monitoring and treatment.

Second trimester cervical length measurements with transvaginal ultrasound: A prospective observational agreement and reliability study.

INTRODUCTION: Universal screening for preterm delivery by adding transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length to routine second trimester ultrasound has been proposed. The aim is to estimate inter- and intraobserver agreement and reliability of second trimester transvaginal ultrasound measurements of cervical length performed by specially trained midwife sonographers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective reliability and agreement study performed in seven Swedish ultrasound centers. In total, 18 midwife sonographers specially trained to perform ultrasound measurements of cervical length and 286 women in the second trimester were included. In each center, two midwife sonographers measured cervical length a few minutes apart in the same woman, the number of women examined per examiner pair varying between 24 and 30 (LIVE study). Sixteen midwife sonographers measured cervical length twice ≥2 months apart on 93 video clips (CLIPS study). The main outcome measures were mean difference, limits of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient, intra-individual standard deviation, repeatability, Cohen's kappa and Fleiss kappa. RESULTS: The limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficient of the best examiner pair in the LIVE study were -4.06 to 4.72 mm and 0.91, and those of the poorest were -11.11 to 11.39 mm and 0.31. In the CLIPS study, median (range) intra-individual standard deviation was 2.14 mm (1.40-3.46), repeatability 5.93 mm (3.88-9.58), intraclass correlation coefficient 0.84 (0.66-0.94). Median (range) interobserver agreement for cervical length ≤25 mm in the CLIPS study was 94.6% (84.9%-98.9%) and Cohen's kappa 0.56 (0.12-0.92), median (range) intraobserver agreement was 95.2% (87.1%-98.9%) and Cohen's kappa 0.68 (0.27-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement and reliability of cervical length measurements differed substantially between examiner pairs and examiners. If cervical length measurements are used to guide management there is potential for both over- and under-treatment. Uniform training and rigorous supervision and quality control are advised.

Very short cervix in low-risk asymptomatic singleton pregnancies: Outcome according to treatment and cervical length at diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the outcome of low-risk singleton pregnancies with very short cervical length (CL ≤15 mm) according to method of treatment and CL at diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study on singleton pregnancies devoid of risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery identified in the course of universal screening programs by vaginal sonography at 20-24 weeks of gestation to have very short CL ≤ 15 mm. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 233 pregnancies with CL ≤ 15 mm of which 88 had cervical cerclage inserted and the remaining 145 were treated with vaginal progesterone. Mean CL at diagnosis was significantly shorter in the cerclage group (5 mm) compared with the progesterone group (12 mm). Regardless of treatment there was no difference in the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation in women with CL ≥ 9 mm at screening (11% and 12% in the cerclage and progesterone groups, respectively). In contrast, in the subgroup with CL ≤ 8 mm cervical cerclage resulted in significantly lower rates of spontaneous preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation compared with progesterone treatment (20% and 45%, respectively, P = .009) and the median gestational age at birth was significantly greater (37 weeks vs 36 weeks, respectively, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of asymptomatic singleton pregnancies with short CL will remain undelivered until 32 weeks of gestation whether treated with progesterone or cerclage. Women with extreme cervical shortening appear to benefit more from cervical cerclage.

Pregnancy outcomes and factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage when used for different indications: A retrospective study of 326 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes resulting from the use of cervical cerclage for different indications and investigate factors that might influence the clinical effects of cervical cerclage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of pregnant women who received cervical cerclage in The Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. Patients were divided into three groups: a history-indicated group; an ultrasound-indicated group and a physical examination-indicated group. The pregnancy outcomes of the three groups were then compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the independent risk factors. RESULTS: Statistical differences were evident when the history-indicated group and the ultrasound-indicated group were compared with the physical examination-indicated group for gestational age at delivery [37.3(33.3-38.9), 35.4(28.9-38.4) vs. 26.1 (24.3-28.4) weeks, respectively, P < 0.05], percentage of cases delivered at < 28 weeks of gestation (13.4%, 20.3% vs. 74.3%, respectively, P < 0.05), percentage of cases delivered at < 37 weeks of gestation (42.7%, 54.2% vs. 91.4%, respectively, P < 0.05) and fetal survival rate (88.4%, 81.4% vs. 40.0%, respectively, P < 0.05). The history-indicated group and the ultrasound-indicated group were similar with regards to these outcomes. The independent risk factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage include age, body mass index (BMI), history of prior preterm birth and second-trimester loss, C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/L and cervical dilation ≥3 cm (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy outcomes were similar when compared between history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Serial cervical surveillance is beneficial for pregnant with a history of cervical insufficiency, and the placement of cervical cerclages in response to ultrasonographically detected shortening of the cervical length is a medically acceptable alternative to the use of history-indicated cerclage.